The Exile's Bazaar
  • Home
  • About
  • Destinations
  • Book
  • Publications
  • Contact

Notes from a fascinating world.

The world is like a bazaar, full of interesting odds and ends, and I've been exiled into it. This is my all-over-the-map (literally and metaphorically) attempt at capturing some of the world's many wonders.

Is Democracy Illusory? Of Kenneth Arrow and the Marquis de Condorcet

2/27/2017

 
PictureKenneth Arrow. Creative Commons.
Kenneth Arrow died last week. 

Professor Kenneth Joseph Arrow of Stanford, naturally the son of immigrants (in this case Romanian Jewish ones), in his lifetime won the John Bates Clark Medal for best economist under 40, the John von Neumann Theory Prize, and, oh yes, the Nobel Prize for Economics. In fact, he remains the youngest person ever to win that particular award.

Arrow was 95.

I discovered Arrow in college, as so many other did as well. It was hard to study social science, any social science (political in my case), without coming across Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem. And for a college sophomore coming across the Theorem for the first time, the idea of it is deeply disturbing, like tremors beneath your feet where you didn’t realize there was ever a fault line.

Here’s Wikipedia’s summary of Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem:

In short, the theorem states that no rank-order voting system can be designed that always satisfies these three “fairness” criteria:

  • If every voter prefers alternative X over alternative Y, then the group prefers X over Y.
  • If every voter’s preference between X and Y remains unchanged, then the group’s preference between X and Y will also remain unchanged (even if voters’ preferences between other pairs like X and Z, Y and Z, or Z and W change).
  • There is no “dictator”: no single voter possesses the power to always determine the group's preference.
That’s without the mathematical derivations that Arrow went through to prove that his postulate was true and always true. The implications of the theorem are immense if not immediate obvious to a non-technical mind. What it means is that given an electorate with more than two choices and a simple preference between them, it is impossible to design a voting procedure that is “fair” and that accurately reflect “the will of the people.” Because of “the will of the people,” that vaunted concept of democracy, never exists as an ascertainable variable that cannot be arbitrarily engineered by the voting process.

The Marquis de Condorcet had actually suggested nearly as much in Enlightenment France, right about the time when James Madison was drafting the U.S. Constitution. The illustration of the Condorcet Paradox was basically this: Assume three voters, A, B, and C, and three candidates, X, Y, and Z. Now suppose A prefers X to Y to Z, B prefers Y to Z to X, and C prefers Z to X to Y. In that scenario, no procedure can fairly pick out a candidate who represents the will of the majority, because there is no will of the majority. Real life is more complicated, but not that much more complicated. In 2016, for example, presumably a subset of voters preferred Sanders to Clinton to Johnson to Trump, while another preferred Johnson to Trump to Sanders to Clinton, and so on. There never was a consensus candidate in 2016 and never could have been.

That was a disturbing thought for a 19-year-old enamored with American democracy. And it’s a disturbing thought today, when democracy worldwide seems on the retreat, when many of our fellow citizens seem not to mind very much if democracy ends, as long as their policy agenda gets enacted. For that matter, the advancements of human thought made possible by the Enlightenment of Condorcet itself seems endangered.

Without those advancements of human reason, we could never have figured out that, mathematically, democracy might be a sham.

And I fall back on Churchill. Mathematics aside, democracy remains the worst form of government excepting all of the others. And that, even without more and in the flimsiness of our lives, is worth fighting for.

Comments are closed.

    Author

    Writer, traveler, lawyer, dilettante. Failed student of physics. Not altogether distinguished graduate of two Ivy League institutions. Immigrant twice over. "The grand tour is just the inspired man's way of getting home."
    Follow me on Twitter (@W_T_Han) and Instagram (@wthtravel).
    ​https://www.scmp.com/author/william-han

    同是天涯淪落人,
    ​相逢何必曾相識?

    Updates Mondays.

     
    Want to be notified of new posts?
    Get newsletter
    Powered By Constant Contact
     

    Archives

    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016

    Categories

    All
    Afghanistan
    Africa
    Amazon
    America
    Antarctica
    Anthropology
    Archaeology
    Architecture
    Argentina
    Armenia
    Art
    Astronomy
    Books
    Brazil
    Buddhism
    Caribbean
    Caribbeans
    Caucasus
    Central America
    Central Asia
    Chile
    China
    Christianity
    Cinema
    Colombia
    Costa Rica
    Criticism
    Cuba
    Culture
    Easter Island
    Economics
    Ecuador
    England
    Essay
    Ethiopia
    Etymology
    Europe
    Family
    Film
    France
    Goths
    Halloween
    Hinduism
    History
    Huns
    Iceland
    Immigration
    Inca
    Indonesia
    Iran
    Iraq
    Islam
    Japan
    Kenya
    Korea
    Law
    Linguistics
    Literature
    Maldives
    Martial-arts
    Mathematics
    Medicine
    Mexico
    Middle East
    Mongolia
    Mythology
    Nepal
    New Zealand
    Pacific-islands
    Panama
    Persia
    Peru
    Philosophy
    Politics
    Portraits & Encounters
    Portugal
    Psychology
    Race
    Refugees
    Religion
    Rome
    Russia
    Science
    Sherlock Holmes
    Singapore
    South America
    Spain
    Sri Lanka
    Superman
    Syria
    Taiwan
    Television
    Travel
    Travel Advice
    Ukraine
    United States
    USA
    Uzbekistan
    Vaccination
    Voltaire
    Women
    Writing
    Zoroastrianism

    RSS Feed

  • Home
  • About
  • Destinations
  • Book
  • Publications
  • Contact